
If one person creates something and someone else decides they want it, it doesn’t matter how badly they want it, how much or how loudly they yell it's theirs, or how much they spend to try to take it… it’s still not theirs.
That's the American Way.
========================================================================================================= Trademark Update - 10/13/2011 In a recent letter I received from Bill Richart, current president of the PGR, he specifically stated: "In the event that you (Jeff Brown) prevail in the Trademark Opposition proceeding...PGR, Inc. will take the necessary steps to change its name and marks, thereby rendering the PGR name and marks as irrelevant."… "Thus, PGR, Inc. is prepared to allow the PGR name and brand to essentially fade away while it continues the mission...it is likely you would be viewed as the one person who caused the demise of the PGR name and its honorable mission." Contrary to what is being disseminated, and regardless of what happens in the trademark dispute, the Patriot Guard Riders will not disappear. Rest assured, we will not allow the PGR to be destroyed. PGR members have worked too long and too hard in building an organization founded on honoring those who serve to allow it to simply "fade away". Our heroes, their families and America deserve and need the Patriot Guard Riders. Those of us who continue to believe in the original PGR and its mission statement are already working to make sure the Patriot Guard Riders continues and returns to “Riding With Respect”. Efforts are already underway to recreate a national structure that will be a relevant and positive factor working effectively with the individual states in the overall PGR organization. Those plans include the development of a new and comprehensive website; true, open, and democratic elections for national and state leaders; and finally, actual transparency and accountability. We expect a decision by the trademark board in a few months. Be prepared...action must be swift. Thanks, Jeff "Twister" Brown Last spring, at the request of both parties, the TTAB suspended proceedings to allow a settlement to be reached. That suspension ended March 31, 2011. As soon as I get time, I will update you on where we stand now and post some details of the proceedings and some excerpts from the depositions taken earlier in this case that may shed additional light on the proceedings. Thanks for your continued support. Trademark Update - 6/17/10
Health Update - 11/17/11
Now that I'm home and out of danger, some of you may not be aware... on Friday, 11-11-11, Veteran's Day, I suffered a heart attack. In retrospect, I haven't been feeling up to par for several months...nothing I could actually put my finger on, just "out of sorts". I was rushed to St. Francis Heart Hospital about 3 AM and went into surgery about noon. One cardiac artery was 99% blocked, but luckily, a stent was inserted before it did much permanent damage to the heart. As Bonnie pointed out, all-in-all, the heart attack was as good as it could have been.
I am feeling much better, just weak and tire very easily. I have a follow up with my cardiologist in a month and am confident I will get the OK to resume normal activities. Until then, I am on "limited duty", off the bike, getting lots of rest and doing everything at a slower pace.
I ask for your patience in answering emails...it's just going to take me a little longer to keep up.
Jeff "Twister"
IMPORTANT INFORMATION…THE PGR WILL NOT BE STOPPED!
Trademark Update - 4/05/2011
Immediately after taking Ronny Awtry’s deposition last spring, the PGR and their attorney asked if we could stop the proceedings and make a settlement offer, which we did. We reached a verbal settlement agreement approved by both Bill Richart and the PGR Board of Directors. The TTAB granted a continuance in order for both sides to complete the settlement. At the request of the PGR, we agreed to keep the contents of the proceeding confidential until everything could be finalized. In the process of committing the verbal agreement to a written document, the settlement was derailed.
As many of you may have heard, the proceedings have been suspended pending settlement discussions.
Trademark Update - 7/24/09
As you may have heard, the Trademark Office basically said they would not grant a Summary Judgment for either party. I had a lengthy conversation with my attorney and I’ll try to explain what this means as I understand it…bear with me, I’m certainly no legal expert.
Rachel advised us up front that the TTAB was usually reluctant to award Summary Judgments and it would be a long shot.
We decided to go ahead and file in an attempt to “fast track” an end to all of this. As she explained it, for the TTAB to award a Summary Judgment, there needs to be virtually indisputable legal case for one party or the other. It is very rare for the evidence to be indisputable, and in this case the TTAB merely decided they wanted to hear more evidence before making a decision. Regardless how others may interpret this decision, or lack of it, both sides ended up in the same position we were before filing for a Summary Judgment.
The case now goes back to more legal filings and another year or more before the final decision will be reached.
Hang in there folks, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. In the mean time, keep the mission foremost in your hearts.
Thanks,
